Energetic Interrelationship of Context
Overview

Core Framework
>Evolution
>Language
>Consciousness
>Interlinguistics
>Energy

Meta Language
>Something From Nothing
>Relationship Interaction
>Energetic Model
>Vowel Schematic
-->Schwa Core
-->Strong Triad "A"
-->Strong Triad "I"
-->Strong Triad "U"
>Consonant Schematic
-->Pulmonic Charge
-->Consonant Flow
-->First Position
-->Second Position
-->Third Position
-->Fifth Position
-->Seventh Position
-->Ninth Position
-->Tenth Position
-->Eleventh Position

Mailing List
Feature

Media
>EnergyLanguage Lecture

Appendix/Reference
>Definitions
>Phraseology
>IPA 1996 Chart (pdf doc)
>IPA Font (true type)

Diagrams
>Full Sweep Schematic
>Complete Plosion Schematic >Tone and Level Indicators

Phraseology: (click for more)

Symbiotic Relationship Development
(allowing mind and language to flourish by providing the seeds of growth and redirecting inquiry along ever-novel guidelines. )

Modeling contextual relationships through interrelatedness of constituent referents.

In this program, ideas and concepts will be grouped together, and then rendered into word form, according to how they relate to each other. This is to say that a word's context will determine how it is spoken, written, and related semantically to other referents. In the diagram system, we can visualize four basic regions. The first is the Context region. This is also known as the Perfection marker. This primary region begins at the 12 o'clock position and sweeps clockwise. This is the theoretical origin of any complete contextual relationship. One full sweep through the diagram represents one completed cycle, one full unit of expression, one trichotomatic array, one octave.

We find the Neutrality region at the 6 o'clock position. It is also known as the Equilibrium marker. It serves as an unaligned annex for the context marker directly above it and completes a feedback continuum along a vertical plane. It can be thought of as the mid-way point during one full cyclic sweep.

The Positive realm is in the 4 o'clock position, also known as the Synonymous marker, while in the 8 o'clock position is the Negative marker, also known as the Antonymous marker. These two diametrically opposed entities form a feedback continuum that is aligned horizontally against the vertical Context / Neutrality continuum.

To offer an example of how context is arrayed in this diagram we will use the following progression. We begin with a single term and determine how it connects to other contextually-related terms.


Consult the following table to see how words are applied according to this methodology.

Context Neutrality Positive Negative
optical visibility clear obscure
luminous luminosity light dark
color chromaticity bright grey/ dull
logic rationality rational irrational
empirical empricism measureable immeasurable
mechanical structure sound unsound
biology biological animate inanimate
living life alive dead
music tonality harmonious cacaphonic
data informational ordered/ predictable disordered/ unpredictable
ethics morality right wrong
religious/ theistic religion/ theism holy evil
evolving evolutionary survival extinction
chemical chemistry unstable
aesthetical aesthetics pleasing offensive/ unstriking
evolving evolutionary survival extinction
possession possessive give take
motion movement go come
time now future past
causality causal cause effect
progress progression start/ begin finish/ end
environment environmental sustainable depletion
nutrition nutrients wholesome
audible audibility loud silent
mass weight heavy/ large light/ small
judiciary judgement innocent guilty
economic economy rich poor
semantic idea word referent
philosophy epistemic true false
evolution active passive
existense something nothing

It should be remembered that not all words or concepts will fit neatly into this schematic plan. Some words have no sensible opposites or contexts, while other words are their own contexts. Yet as we test words to see if they fit, we can learn some interesting things about context, opposites, and absences. Moreover, the lack of a specific word to occupy a specific place on the diagram may lead us to develop new thoughts and words where none exist yet.

It seems as though in most languages, a dichotomy is favored for words and their opposites, in a kind of "either or" relationship. Through an evaluative system such as this, we can determine whether a dichotomatic system is the only alternative to evaluating possible connotations. We can also expose some of the descriptive inadequacies of languages today and suggest a richer realm to develop them into.

| home | overview | core framework | meta language | contact | preferences